A New Model for PE Associate Recruiting is Sorely Needed

What's the point of PE firms paying headhunters this much money only to have such a shitshow every year for both candidates and the funds themselves? Everyone I know is just getting traumatized this year for very little spots actually being filled. In previous years you could say the headhunters did an acceptable job facilitating on cycle, but this year clearly shows how "on-cycle" is just a failure of a concept engineered by the cartel that is headhunters. 

Just a thought experiment, but what is preventing PE firms from doing their own hiring? They have the incoming class of outgoing analysts joining their firms as associates, can't they just get them to collect the names of the best first-years from their banks to the firm to be interviewed? This is a sure better way to go about recruiting than the currently sh*tshow and embarrassment we do hvae. 

 

Based on previous WSO threads, here are some insights into the current state of PE associate recruiting and the role of headhunters:

Issues with Current PE Recruiting Model:

  1. Headhunter Dependency:

    • PE firms have traditionally relied heavily on headhunters to source candidates. This process has been reinforced over decades, making it a deeply ingrained practice.
    • Headhunters often come from elite backgrounds and have strong social connections, which can create a narrow pool of candidates.
  2. On-Cycle Recruiting Challenges:

    • The "on-cycle" recruiting process has become increasingly stressful and competitive, with many candidates feeling traumatized by the experience.
    • The process is often seen as a failure, with headhunters struggling to effectively match candidates to the limited spots available.
  3. Training and Skill Gaps:

    • There is a noticeable degradation in technical and modeling skills among new associates, partly due to the shift to remote work.
    • PE firms are now bearing the burden of training first-year associates, which was previously handled by banks.

Potential Alternatives:

  1. Direct Hiring by PE Firms:

    • PE firms could consider bypassing headhunters and conducting their own hiring processes.
    • Incoming associates could help identify top first-year analysts from their previous banks, creating a more targeted and potentially effective recruiting strategy.
  2. Leveraging Relationships:

    • PE firms could utilize their existing relationships and networks to source candidates, rather than relying solely on headhunters.
    • This approach could lead to a more personalized and efficient recruiting process.
  3. Focus on Diversity and Soft Skills:

    • There is a growing emphasis on increasing diversity within PE firms, driven by mandates from LPs.
    • While technical skills are important, firms are also looking for candidates with strong executive presence and soft skills.

Conclusion:

The current PE recruiting model, heavily reliant on headhunters and the on-cycle process, is facing significant challenges. PE firms might benefit from exploring alternative approaches, such as direct hiring and leveraging internal networks, to create a more effective and less stressful recruiting process.

For more detailed discussions and experiences, you can refer to the following threads on WSO: - "Do your associates just not care?" - "PE Recruiting: Deciding what firm is the best fit" - "PE Recruiting For Non-Targets" - "Basic Questions About PE Recruiting Answered"

These threads provide valuable insights into the current state of PE recruiting and potential ways to improve the process.

Sources: Do your associates just not care?, From Private Equity Associate to VP in Private Equity, Basic Questions About PE Recruiting Answered, PE Recruiting For Non-Targets, STOP obsessing about windows to jump thru for PE!!!

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 
Most Helpful

Why do you think its the HHs that are kicking this off? On-cycle typically kicks off because a fund presses the button, which leads to all other funds also following to avoid APO/BX/w.e. MF from having exclusive first look at the incoming analysts. BX took on-cycle/hiring in-house last year and they still were interviewing at the same time as everyone else, just without the HH layer.

 

Ignore my title but currently PE sr associate at a UMM shop and have friends at the principal/VP level at a variety of different shops. I think the trend is many firms are going to be doing their own recruiting. Maybe not the biggest guys because of their inefficient HR hierarchy but even at my shop and several other shops, there are serious talks of doing direct hires. Some shops I know are planning to experiment with hiring back sophomore interns that went on top EB/BBs to be back after their analyst stint. 

 

There were groups within certain large cap funds that evaluated and had good candidates in front of them and just decided not to hire because it’s so early.

 

Est voluptates quo voluptate officiis illo sed. Voluptatem libero facilis culpa asperiores harum laborum deserunt. Natus inventore delectus iure.

Corporis consequatur reiciendis pariatur voluptatem nam alias. Fuga culpa corporis totam exercitationem. Ex hic nisi et ea quis qui culpa.

Eligendi ut quae nihil facere id. Fugiat alias ut commodi aspernatur. Suscipit veritatis maxime ducimus. Iusto facere odit laborum. Exercitationem tenetur est qui repudiandae mollitia dolores asperiores. Sed sed possimus maxime consequatur neque sequi porro.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 99.0%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (22) $569
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (91) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (206) $268
  • 1st Year Associate (390) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (29) $154
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (316) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”