Quantitative Easing on Active vs Passive Debate

Hi everyone,

Forgive me if what I am about to write is factually incorrect. I am only a high schooler who is passionate about investing and finance.

I watched a documentary recently saying that after the financial crisis, the Federal Reserve started to buy a large number of government bonds and mortgage-backed securities. Since then, the Fed has only increased its so-called "Quantitative Easing, " resulting in inflated asset prices. As I have learned in my accounting class, the yield or the interest rates decrease as a result of the increased bond price. Markets generally react positively with lower interest rates.

Could the bull market we are experiencing be attributed to this quantitative easing? Or is my fundamental understanding wrong? 

As I have learned, active funds generally perform better than passive funds in a bear market and vice versa in a bull market. So, my question is: Is the trend towards passive funds due to the result of this quantitative easing? And will it shift back to active funds when the next bear market hits?

I know this "Active vs Passive" debate has been covered ad nauseam on this forum, so sorry in advance if this has already been said 

Is LO AM a dying career? I have heard mixed opinions on this so I am not really sure. 

 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, here's what you need to know:

Quantitative Easing and Market Trends

  • Quantitative Easing (QE): After the financial crisis, the Federal Reserve indeed started buying large amounts of government bonds and mortgage-backed securities. This increased demand for these assets, driving up their prices and lowering their yields (interest rates).
  • Impact on Markets: Lower interest rates generally lead to higher asset prices as borrowing costs decrease, making it cheaper for companies to finance operations and growth. This can contribute to a bull market.

Active vs Passive Funds

  • Performance in Different Markets:
    • Active Funds: Tend to perform better in bear markets as active managers can make strategic decisions to mitigate losses.
    • Passive Funds: Often perform better in bull markets as they simply track the market index, benefiting from overall market growth.
  • Trend Towards Passive Funds: The trend towards passive funds has been influenced by several factors, including lower fees and the consistent underperformance of many active managers compared to their benchmarks during bull markets.

Future Shifts

  • Potential Shift Back to Active Funds: If a bear market occurs, there might be a shift back to active funds as investors seek managers who can navigate downturns more effectively.

LO Asset Management (AM) Career Outlook

  • Mixed Opinions: There are varied opinions on the future of LO AM careers. Some believe that the industry is facing challenges due to fee pressures and underperformance, while others see it as a valuable and intellectually stimulating career with good compensation and reasonable hours.

For more detailed discussions and insights, you might want to explore the following threads on WSO: - Will asset management industry just wither away? - Associate positions at AMs will die off at an accelerated rate - Work at top AM -- AI will virtually kill off entry-level roles in AM over the next 5yrs

I'm sorry, but it looks like this may be out of my ability to answer... maybe some of the links above might help?

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 
Most Helpful

You're a pretty smart high-schooler. You're correct on the inverse relationship between yield and price for bonds, but I usually think about it from the opposite chain of causality. The fed cuts interest rates (at some time in the future), investors will accept newly issued bonds with lower yields, the existing bonds that have higher yields become more attractive their price goes up. Read Fabozzi's fixed income securities for more info. 

Quantitative easing definitely has an impact on asset prices and the economy in general. The fed was ending its recent foray into QE around June 2022 and beginning Quantitative Tightening, which was a pretty novel process. Rising interest rates did a number on fixed income, wall street is all hyped about the potential of interest rate cuts (expansionary monetary policy) in the coming months. You talked about bull vs bear markets, and if you mean equities the story there is a little more complicated. A lot of the equity valuation growth in the last year or so has been from mega cap tech companies (microsoft, meta, nvidia, etc) with the gains a little less diversified than some expected (people keep thinking value stocks will go up but growth stocks continue to kill it). 

Active management will never totally disappear, obv hedgefunds do it to generate alpha but AM shops generally have active funds too, although its mostly passive these days you're right. Turns out alpha generation is hard and few managers can consistently do it. Passive management is cheaper for the customer (lower fees) and that's a big selling point for most retail investors. Neither will disappear, but the shift towards passive for the big AM shops is probably a durable change, not a cyclical thing. Hope all that helps, i'm no expert

 

 

Eos reprehenderit dolor earum a sint. Sint corrupti exercitationem qui non dicta illo. Distinctio numquam modi illum qui aut. Pariatur sed minima nostrum ab ea distinctio numquam. Molestias deserunt corporis natus magni. Magnam dolorum et perferendis ut harum. Sit sint dolor voluptas dolor.

Aut sed distinctio odio laborum necessitatibus eligendi. Aliquid sint deleniti excepturi ea non. Quis alias quibusdam veniam quos ut iusto harum.

Est incidunt autem ullam voluptate. Dicta sint aut quos voluptas at aspernatur fugit quis. Et assumenda consequatur facere corrupti.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Lazard Freres No 98.9%
  • Perella Weinberg Partners New 98.3%
  • Harris Williams & Co. 24 97.7%
  • Goldman Sachs 16 97.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • William Blair 03 97.7%
  • Lazard Freres 06 97.2%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.9%
  • Perella Weinberg Partners 18 98.3%
  • JPMorgan Chase 06 97.7%
  • Moelis & Company 06 97.2%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (23) $378
  • Associates (96) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • 2nd Year Analyst (69) $168
  • Intern/Summer Associate (34) $167
  • 1st Year Analyst (213) $160
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (155) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”