Why is everyone saying real estate is peaking right now?

Why is every one saying the real estate market is at the peak of its cycle and is about to crash? I understand that there will be more interest rate hikes, and in some areas, some housing prices seem over inflated. What other reasons are there though?

 

Office has seen some of the worst occupancy rates around due to technological shifts. Multifamily developers pooped out a bazillion Class A luxury apartments and continue to build. Supply now outpaces demand. Cap rates are low. However, I think while the market may have peaked, that doesn't mean we should expect some huge drop. I think it will just flatline here.

Array
 

Sounds to me like you're exaggerating on what you heard, or you were misinformed. No informed RE professional is saying RE is about to crash. There is a consensus that there are certain market segments due for a correction (i.e. class-A MF with oversupply in various CBD's, class-B/C malls, high-street retail in Manhattan, etc.), in addition to potential valuation hits due to cap rate expansions (devaluation over a 4-year, 100 bps cap rate expansion supersedes a 4-years of 3% rent growth CAGR pretty significantly). That being said, sponsors of some deals can very well not make a profit, and MAYBE a few deals will have partial equity write offs.

What I just described is not comparable to 2008 where equity was getting wiped out and lenders were taking 50% write offs. That is what you call a crash.

 

Not a RE guy so I've always wondered this... OP this is not directly in relation to your comment, I've just always wondered this... not saying this is exactly what you asked.

Can you really just make broad statements like "RE is about to crash?" Excluding 2008 style implosions, isn't the RE market so incredibly pocketed that it would be hard to just make broad inferences about it as a whole? Seems like places like NYC could have drastically different cycles than Raleigh, Miami, Denver, etc. Obviously rates are going to affect across the country/world, but is the supply and demand side so easily viewed?

 

There are a few things out there that could provide downward pressure on housing prices: -rising interest rates -record levels of leverage in consumption to household net worth -baby boomer transition - when the generation starts to pass away en masse, their children (millennials) will either a) not want to own the house and sell it or b) not be able to afford the taxes and upkeep and sell it.

 

This. +1 SB

I know a few folks my age who inherited million dollar homes that sold because they could not simply afford it.

 

I disagree. I think there's going to be a new movement to the suburbs after my generation (millennials) age another 10-15 years.

It is not sustainable to pay $2,000 + $200 in parking & other fees every month, for many years - possibly decades - without building any equity. It is not sustainable to date someone, marry, and then have kids while sharing another 2 bedroom, 650 sf apartment in an urban city. It is not desirable for families to send their kids to many below-par public schools within urban cores (as we all know suburban publics and privates tend to be better).

Everyone is forgetting upcoming tech. With driverless cars, it's going to allow people to live farther away while maintaining an ease of access to urban cores. Instead of being walking distance to the grocery store and bar, people may decide it's better to be within a 10 minute Uber/Tesla ride, where you can surf the web and watch netflix while being driven.

I think this is why none of the public SFR REITs have begun selling their assets. Collectively, they hold over 120,000 or so houses in class A submarkets. Even though they have a low basis because they picked up these assets in foreclosure through 08-12', I believe they will hold onto these cash flowing rentals, and off load some years later when they begin having to replace thousands of houses with new roofs, AC units, etc.

 

With you on that. I'm an 'older' millennial and do not buy the 'every millennial wants to live in tiny apartments on top of each other model'. I also do not know many other 30 year olds that really want to stay in that type of accommodation long term at all. 80% of friends are married and they all want to be in a house with a yard if not already. When we were in our 20's, sure it was fine. Having a small place also sucks if you have any kind of hobby that isn't just City drinking and brunch. blah. The self driving cars is a game changer. I'll live 2 hours away in a mansion if I can work in a self driving car to be in an office 5 hours a day.

 

With regard to for sale housing, I just read a bloomberg piece regarding available properties. It's a record low. If I recall, available listings is about 25% of what it was in 2007. This tells me that volume of deals might be really low as well. A precursor in my opinion to a housing correction is rising home prices with low transaction volume.

Yes, of course, it's all regional.

 

Smart money is finding it incredibly difficult to find good risk-adjusted returns.

Interest rate increases are real. So you should be modelling cap rate expansion and moderating your leverage.

In simplistic terms, think about a discount rate as r+g where r is the cap rate and g is your growth rate. If rates are going up, your discount rate is going up. And if growth is decelerating, you got to figure that cap rates are going up.

There are still spots where you can find value, but they are getting harder and harder to find.

 

Basically agreed here. You don't see many compelling investment opportunities in key markets right now, certainly nothing of scale. Interest rate increases may take time before they take effect, but moderate cap rate expansion is very likely. The weight of cross-border capital flows from the likes of China are also being curtailed by government policies, which means that capital markets are bound to trend towards normalcy sooner rather than later.

I'd be positioning my developed market portfolio for a moderate downturn so as to have financial means necessary to act in the event of a material dip (lengthen debt terms, reduce leverage, raise cash from sales of overprices assets in trendy markets). In the long run I'm more positive and I think 10 years from now prices will be higher than they are now. Short term wise, look at Brazil or India. Maybe cautiously Japanese logistics development.

 

The market is no where near the peak. Think about it.

We are at a point where we are literally tasked with reinventing every major city ACROSS THE WORLD. Multiple US cities are in housing crises because of the no development period after the economic crisis.

This is just getting started.

For example in LA, there is a need for 3 million units to be developed in the next 10 years to accommodate all of the newcomers.(200k every year)

3 effing million. That is a crazy amount of development in an already built city. There needs to be innovation, re purposing of abandoned buildings, legislation, response to economic trends, spending trends, transit development, redesigning for sustainability, etc.

The only thing that can slow this development is all the geopolitical bs that is affecting the world. Trump, the populist movement, and the threat of another war. The possibility of rates raising is also a threat but....what's risk without the reward?

 

It's crazy how short on housing LA is. People are willing to be duped with high prices because there are not that many vacancy options.

 
KHALEESI:
We are at a point where we are literally tasked with reinventing every major city ACROSS THE WORLD. Multiple US cities are in housing crises because of the no development period after the economic crisis.

This is just getting started.

For example in LA, there is a need for 3 million units to be developed in the next 10 years to accommodate all of the newcomers.(200k every year)

3 effing million.

all this projected growth is just that: a projection. if there's an economic crisis then you might end up throwing all these growth projections out the window.
 

The issue with new apartment development is the sky rocketing cost of construction which makes pro forma rents really high and an extremely risky proposition. You can have all the demand in the world, but if wage growth can't keep up with rent growth it doesn't matter. I've sold some apartment complexes which were historic mills that had been repurposed using historic tax credits to create really nice lofts, but those opportunities for developers are few and far between.

 

If rates are higher, that means the cost of borrowing is higher -> your leveraged IRR would be higher

To make higher returns, you need to either increase revenues or cut expenses.

 

Uh, I'm sorry, what? Please explain the logic that more expensive capital leads to higher returns.

If you're arguing that higher rates indirectly lead to NOI bumps because rents need to rise for investors to meet their returns, I completely disagree. It's a function of the leasing market. If landlords could just charge more rent they already would've.

 

I'm also confused here - surely the inverse (higher cost of borrowing = lower leveraged IRR) is true assuming all else constant?

"Average people have great ideas. Legends have great execution"
 

Have several thoughts. I'd be curious to see what everyone's input is, but overall I think these are hinting at a market slowdown. (bear in mind I'm in MF, so that's what all the below points are geared towards)

  • Real wage growth is at zero, yet rent growth, as well as most other living expenses, are still increasing at a rate >CPI. Not sure how long this can continue.

  • In most areas, caps are extremely low and are continuing to drop, even with the recent decrease in transaction volume. There's a lot of speculative interest in RE, but people aren't pulling the trigger.

  • Cost of borrowing is greater.

  • In all those high profile areas a massive amount of deliveries are about to come online.

In my opinion, all of the above signal a downturn in the RE MF market. However, the beauty of RE is there's always opportunity, you just have to cater your investment thesis to the current environment and adjust your expectations.

 

In San Diego I'm seeing deals across my desk that are 5% cheaper today than just 6mo ago. Yes, MF appears to be showing chinks in the armor as the first asset class (barring regional malls) to show weakness.

First American Commercial Escrow has a national office here. They are slowwww.

Rates are coming back down though. Freddie Mac just lowered their rates 10bps. Not a huge decrease, but the 10yr is at 2.20...down from 2.55 or so. If Wall St. continues to slide it may counter any increases by the Fed.

 

I think this is all relative to what market you're in. The major markets like LA, San Diego, Chicago, NYC, etc... have definitely topped off. Rising concessions and a fall in YOY rental growth definitely points to the fact renters can't bare higher rental rates any longer there. Especially when you have a housing expense to income ratio exceeding 50% which is pretty ridiculous. Other markets like those in the Southeast such as the Carolinas and Georgia still have very strong market fundamentals with a lot of job growth, corporate relocations, friendly tax environments and a housing expense to income ratio still in the 20-30% range which is continuously fostering rental growth. So, there is still a lot of runway there.

 
Best Response

Nihil inventore fugiat sunt temporibus voluptatem et. Suscipit eius amet blanditiis ut qui aspernatur. Atque facere cumque quam molestiae libero fugiat.

Esse ipsam et quaerat magnam doloremque beatae pariatur. Eos non eligendi recusandae modi cupiditate qui odio. Sint aut aut optio ad odio totam amet. Aperiam ratione totam nostrum dolorem eaque eos esse.

 

Sapiente sapiente voluptatem nisi et ipsum facere quod ipsum. Et odio consequatur est deleniti quia id. Consequatur veniam recusandae molestias natus est. Quis aliquid excepturi quos voluptatum consequatur ut consequatur sit. Aspernatur et sit quisquam in. Dicta magnam reprehenderit aliquid numquam.

Vel quia autem consequatur voluptatibus voluptatem quo perferendis. Molestiae voluptatem aut rerum eos laudantium debitis a. Doloremque a quaerat nisi sapiente eos tempore aut. Officiis dolor unde a in est quod. Consectetur voluptatem architecto labore sed sunt.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Lazard Freres No 98.9%
  • Perella Weinberg Partners New 98.3%
  • Harris Williams & Co. 24 97.7%
  • Goldman Sachs 16 97.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • William Blair 03 97.7%
  • Lazard Freres 06 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.9%
  • Perella Weinberg Partners 18 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 06 97.7%
  • Credit Suisse 04 97.2%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (23) $378
  • Associates (95) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • 2nd Year Analyst (69) $168
  • Intern/Summer Associate (34) $167
  • 1st Year Analyst (213) $160
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (154) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
numi's picture
numi
98.8
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”