Oppenheimer SF Tech Group - Excel Modeling Test

If you make it to round 2 or beyond of the Oppenheimer SF Tech Group interviews for full-time, you will be given a 1 hour Microsoft Excel Modeling Test. Here is what you should expect and should be able to do in 1 hour.

1) Income statement: You will be given information about a SaaS company and it's historical revenues and future revenue growth. Additionally, you will be given their gross margin percentages, and multiple operating expenses such as sales & marketing, depreciation, and stock-based compensation. These will be given as percentages of revenue, and they may throw in an element to throw you off, such as sales & marketing is expected to decline 25% of the change in revenue. Just be sure to read the question carefully so you catch these tricks. From there you will asked to create a 5-year forecasted income statement model based on the given assumptions and financial inputs.

2) Valuation: You will be asked to calculate free cash flow and WACC and calculate enterprise value in a DCF. They will likely also throw in some information to try and make you get confused, so be sure to read the question carefully.

3) Contextualization: Based on the financial model and income statement projections, as well as the DCF valuation, you will be asked to write a short paragraph describing the business, what stage of growth it's in, and to contextualize the valuation and financials and describe why it makes sense. (example: EBITDA is negative for the first 2 years because they are keeping sales & marketing expenses high to grow fast and find product market fit).

In summary, have some background knowledge or experience on software businesses and how to model a SaaS company, and be comfortable and knowledgeable on the financial statements of SaaS businesses. Watch YouTube videos to help explain topics. Totally do-able. Just prepare. You got it.

 

Was this for a starting analyst 1 position or lateral analyst 1 / analyst 2? 

 

Nulla et minima hic eaque. Libero nihil eveniet voluptatem sequi natus. Voluptas error sit exercitationem corrupti maxime tempora amet id. Consequatur nam minus non.

Rem aspernatur repudiandae et. Nobis suscipit ut error deleniti.

Consequuntur molestias sunt consectetur rerum voluptatem. Sapiente corrupti ducimus repellendus rerum quisquam porro aut.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Perella Weinberg Partners New 98.9%
  • Lazard Freres 01 98.3%
  • Harris Williams & Co. 24 97.7%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 19 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.9%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 97.7%
  • Moelis & Company 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.9%
  • Perella Weinberg Partners 18 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 16 97.7%
  • Moelis & Company 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (22) $375
  • Associates (94) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (69) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (206) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (149) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”