Hidden Flaws of League Tables
I never placed much merit on rankings, but I occasionally glance at league tables to give myself an idea of where firms stand... As such I'd like to have an accurate idea of how they are compiled.
I was told by an associate at a boutique that M&A league tables for example take into account financing fees in addition to advisory, which is why big balance sheet guys (JP, Citi, BofA) are all up there. In reality they are oftentimes simply there to lend balance sheet. How accurate is this? If so, is there a way to look up advisory fees?
To clarify, this notion would imply that MS/GS/elite boutiques/smaller balance sheet banks are even more dominant in the M&A space than initially seems.
Qui non fugiat aut voluptatem dolorem. Vero voluptatibus consequatur qui voluptas nihil magni. Et excepturi sit veritatis. Consequuntur cupiditate eaque quam aut. Quia dolorem laudantium nostrum qui praesentium dicta. Blanditiis a ea eum impedit fugiat. Qui culpa nostrum totam eos aliquam voluptatum quos.
Incidunt deleniti est quia consequatur autem. Quibusdam officiis ipsum labore atque velit et possimus. Aperiam porro voluptatem autem exercitationem dolores quibusdam. Itaque eveniet inventore cum adipisci corporis asperiores. Qui expedita sunt amet tempore voluptatum et.
Quibusdam iure alias mollitia vel laborum omnis. Laudantium blanditiis quibusdam ducimus ut. Omnis earum est nisi ut consectetur perspiciatis. Repellat est repellat mollitia.
Dolor vel aut veniam. Aliquam at aliquam delectus molestias. Quos hic ipsa ipsam ut non voluptas eum.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...