The total ROI on Equity should be higher than the cost of debt. That is positive leverage. If you don’t have that, then why not be a lender and why bother with your equity investment?

“The three most harmful addictions are heroin, carbohydrates, and a monthly salary.” - Nassim Taleb
 

Cost of equity reflects the risk of the company relative to the market in excess of the risk-free rate. It has nothing to do with the distribution of capital. Remember when you release a dividend the stock price should equal the total distribution of that dividend.

Debt should be cheaper than equity because it takes on less risk.

 
Etb:
But if its stated that the risk of an equity investment is higher and therefore equity investors need to be compensated with a higher return than debt investors then how are they eventually? What do you mean by "the stock price should be equal to that dividend"?

If the companies market cap is 100m and they pay a 20m dividend then the new market cap should converge to 80m

 

if you watch shark tank (which you should) you would have learned that for a startup, equity is more expensive than debt for the founder to sell IF THE COMPANY WILL GROW EXPONENTIALLY.

So, imagine your small company had 100k in sales (revenue) on 20k in costs, for a total profit of 80k. Imagine that you could scale that business to 1 billion in sales, at the same cost ratio, so 200mm in costs, for a total profit of 800mm.

Imagine you need 1 million dollars to get the scale going, and you as the founder/owner have 2 choices 1 - give up 40% of the equity for that 1mm 2 - borrow 1mm for 20% annual interest, repayable within 5 years

If you can scale up to 10mm in sales within 1 year, thus profiting 8mm minus your debt...and then keep up scaling....the total vale of your equity will be higher, than if you gave up 40% of your equity for that 1mm equity stake

Do the math

under the equity sale, and our 10mm revenue projection 40% of 8mm = 3.2mm (this is given to your new shark investor) leaving you 4.8mm

or 20% interest on 1mm = 200k, after which you buy back/retire that debt (so, your 8mm profit becomes 6.8mm, (and you are now debt free)

which scenario do you choose?

just google it...you're welcome
 

you dont need to yes tax reduces its cost by being tax deductable but from a risk reward standpoint a priori debt is always cheaper than equity

 

Consequuntur pariatur provident recusandae porro non atque. Sed dolorem sapiente et ea aspernatur reprehenderit.

Nobis dolorem aut recusandae. Debitis doloribus ea molestiae mollitia quaerat. Earum ut quis a ex perspiciatis veniam.

Possimus mollitia eligendi esse quam nesciunt quia. Omnis maxime reiciendis reiciendis placeat porro. Velit dignissimos animi sapiente est provident. Dolores est nihil vitae et ullam ut.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Lazard Freres No 98.9%
  • Perella Weinberg Partners New 98.3%
  • Harris Williams & Co. 24 97.7%
  • Goldman Sachs 16 97.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • William Blair 03 97.7%
  • Lazard Freres 06 97.2%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.9%
  • Perella Weinberg Partners 18 98.3%
  • JPMorgan Chase 06 97.7%
  • Moelis & Company 06 97.2%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (23) $378
  • Associates (95) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • 2nd Year Analyst (69) $168
  • Intern/Summer Associate (34) $167
  • 1st Year Analyst (213) $160
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (155) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”