Advice on offers
Hey guys, I am quite conflicted between the two offers. Both offers are right out of undergrad in the UK. I have no plan of getting an MBA. I'm not crazy about PE and would be more interested in public markets (HF/LO).
A. Eaton Vance (MSIM) Research role (equity) - the team seems nice and more interesting work than IBD. My concern is whether I can do the job well as I didn't have prior research experience. I was wondering what the mobility is like for a LO role (thinking of going to Asia long term). Wouldn't hesitate to take it if it were a tier 1 AM offer but I'm not sure if EV is better than the IBD offer I have.
B. Top 3 BB IBD - obvious pros and cons.
Any input is appreciated!
Hi happybunny999, check out these threads:
More suggestions...
Hope that helps.
Interested. Wht u ended up doing
Top IB or Eaton Vance ER? Is the Eaton Vance role an investing role or sell-side equity research role? If you're interested in HF/AM long term I don't see how picking EV and skipping the IB stint would be a bad choice.
Eaton Vance would be a junior analyst investing position. There is no sell-side at EV/MSIM.
EV is a good shop and being added to the MS umbrella will only increase its stance. I think either will give you the same LO/HF exits but IBD will give you more outside of LO/HF (if you change your mind).
If you're not interested, I say save yourself the IBD headache, buyside is most people's end goal. I would guess that switching internally to IBD at MS wouldn't be the hardest if you wanted to change your mind a year or two in
Seems EV is more aligned with your goals. Why not just start on the buyside?
Odio qui corporis sint accusantium dolores ex quis. Voluptatem repellat tenetur quae minus provident sit dolorum.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...