I know there is the traditional path of banking to REPE but I'm looking for different stories. I understand that under the right circumstances this is possible but has anyone ever seen someone say lateral from a associate to associate say from a smaller REPE shop to a MF without an MBA? I have a friend who went from a VP at a very small family office to a senior associate at a MF but other than that, I cant think of any other examples.
| +38 | Why sell off-market? | 14 | 2d | |
| +35 | Do you model an acquisition on a monthly or annual basis? | 12 | 1d | |
| +23 | Why Shouldn't I be a Senior Core Lender | 7 | 2h | |
| +21 | Would Moving To A Smaller City Going To Hurt Your Career? | 11 | 4h | |
| +20 | Are the Capital Markets Producer stories true? | 11 | 1d | |
| +20 | What to do in my CRE internship? | 2 | 3d | |
| +19 | Acquisitions DD/modeling - side gig? | 9 | 2d | |
| +18 | Career Path Advice - CRE Debt | 1 | 13h | |
| +18 | How much is the ability to invest in deals at a job worth? | 14 | 1d | |
| +15 | RE at a Tech Company? | 4 | 1d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
This is extremely common in re, maybe not as much as associate but analyst I know for sure. Go snoop around LinkedIn for a bit
Currently have a friend interviewing with an MF for REPE analyst role. My friend's background is semi-target -> Big 4 Audit for RE -> small debt/equity brokerage group. Not sure if offer was given, but killed the modeling test and made it to final rounds. This is probably not the norm, but does inspire hope for those from nontraditional path.
Can’t stand when the term “Mega Fund” is thrown around with respect to RE. It has no standardized meaning in the RE world
I think OP is talking about either very large REPE shops or MFs with PE arms. I would assume shops that fall in this category are BX, Carlyle, Brookfield, KKR, etc. I am sure I missed some names.
It’s still a dumb phrase. There are probably a dozen REPE firms that don’t fit that description but offer better experience to junior employees, pay more and do higher profile deals than Carlyle or Ares (Carlyle does a lot of small deals tbh).
Working at Carlyle vs TPG would be two very different experiences. Working at Westbrook Partners vs Centerbridge would offer very different experiences. Barriers to entry and promotion opportunities at these firms are not the same either. Yet all are “mega funds”.
The reason the term came about in the corporate PE forum is because the “mega funds” for the most part, do the same size deals (the biggest), offer similar pay / experience to junior employees, recruit from the same IB programs, offer the same exits / B-School options, have the same internal promotion options (primarily 2-3 years as an associate and out), and so on.
So in the corporate PE world it makes sense to group them together. This isn’t the case with RE
Personally, I think it's mostly students, interns, and some early career analysts/associates that talk about "pathways to mega funds".... Not meant to offend, once you get a specialty/track record/experience, where you do what you are good at is really less important.
Lots of people leave 'mega funds' to smaller shops to get promotions, raises, and/or just better work/life setup. Smaller firms/teams are desired by many. I work for a developer that does 'high end' type project but is smaller by design than the mega large Hines/Related types. We hire people from those type firms who want to leave and they always talk about how much they disliked the 'large' nature of those firms. That is personal preference.
Anyway, I bring this up for a reason.... Most of the world is not trying to get hired by mega funds later in career, so the fact that it doesn't seem like it happens all the time should be put into context. People tend to leave mega funds for smaller firms, just like people exiting I-banks and even large PE shops. The allure fades really fast once you are in the industry.
This guy doesn't miss. I rarely find a post from you that I disagree with.
Yeah, we skipped poster of the year last year WallStreetOasis.com AndyLouis but redever is my #1 candidate for 2020.
I've seen it done many times by colleagues and I don't think it is hard at all to make the jump.
Like others have said though, I can't think of too many reasons as to why someone would ever want to make this transition. Only one I can think of is to help placement into an elite MBA program, but if you're at this point I'm not sure how you can justify needing an MBA other than a desire to exit real estate.
I lateraled from a middle market REPE fund to a mega fund three years out of school. Only applied to one shop and got the job, but the interview process was brutal. You need to get a 100% on the modeling test and know what you’re talking about to become a douchebag mega fund glorified excel minion.
Does this also apply if you are working for a middle market developer and want to work for a big time developer?
I’m honestly not sure.
Generically, I would say yes. Development is more skills/project oriented, the firm name is less meaningful (same can be said going from 'mega' developer to middle market...). Thus, if you worked on a project fits the model of the next developer, you could be desired.
Quite a few people in my firm have joined from smaller, more local developers. "name brand" stuff really is more for the finance world, real estate could give two shits. Look at brokerage, a "hot player" at a small firm can get offers from big brands if they want, probably with sign-on bonuses. It's all about productions/deals/relationships you bring to the next place.
I seriouslly cannot stress this enough, who your prior employer was will offer little to your next employer, they don't give a shit. They care about your ability/skills/relationships. The only reason "big name" firms appear to have any advantage in "exit ops" is that they often hire brand new people (part of being big) and have infrastructure that trains/develops them well (and legit deal flow/execution ability of course!).
Thus, if you figure your shit out elsewhere, all you have to do is convince the next group to get the gig (brand name does help the HR screeners, but networking can negate that deficiency quite well).
Iste dolor quae inventore enim molestiae harum quas totam. Quo in enim et maiores. Corrupti sequi aut hic omnis illo itaque corporis. Magnam ut et architecto delectus nulla dicta. Ut numquam voluptatem voluptatum veritatis nobis explicabo tempore.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...