Is debt more attractive than equity right now?

Right now feels like a great time to be a debt investor and a difficult time to be a core/core-plus focused equity investor over a near/medium term horizon.

Transitional debt spreads for new loans have increased anywhere from 100bps - 300+bps, which equate to 10%+ IRRs for those that lever their positions. Sure you won't hit a home run, but you'll get a great yield and almost certainty get 100% back at payoff, and even in severe distress are likely to recover most of your basis.

Equity investors need to determine a value (difficult to know right now), and if they whiff, it doesn't matter if they're able to keep it leased and collect 100% of rent over the next few years (which feels unlikely in current environment), they blew their IRR by buying at time high of a price when the market values were in flux. A lot of potential even in the low risk end of the space to miss your return threshold.

Curious to hear different opinions here, but to me it feels if you're an allocator targeting high single digit/low teen returns, the debt space would be the place to be for the time being.

Edit - just to be clear, trying more to compare transitional debt origination to core-plus acquisitions which generally are targeting the same return profile. I'm sure guys in the value-add/opportunistic field are going to have the chance to blow it our of the water here, same with guys that have been buying bonds, but that's not really what allocators in this risk space are looking to do.

 

Interesting topic right now... if you were considering mezz vs pref equity right now, what would be the pros and cons behind each position? The rates appear similar, both solving for a 10-13% IRR, and both have similar coupons, so is the only difference the rights?

That doesn't really make sense to me on why 1 option wouldn't almost always be better than the other, which is why i think im missing something.

Could anyone outline the exact benefits each has, ie coupon/yield, and total return (IRR) each investor is solving for (pref or mezz investor)

Come to think about it... mezz lenders lever themselves aggresivley, right? Do pref 'investors' alos? this would make a big difference in returns obviously.

 

In practical terms, there is little that distinguishes mezz and pref. The only real difference from an execution perspective is that the fitch model doesn't ding you for pref the way it does for mezz, so the last 12 months have seen way more mezz than pref so that people can layer this behind their cmbs debt.

Also, they don't realllllly solve for IRR's as much as they're solving for multiples, usually.

 

Thanks, I've been reading up on UCC liens... but practically, what is the difference between the 2 if with Mezz you have a lien on the borrowing entity, and with pref you take their share of equity. Both options appear to solve for the same thing - take over borrower, vs take over the equity of the borrower..... I am failing to see the fundamental difference between the two..

 

Interesting - why did the funds need the liquidity? Better priced debt that they wanted to reinvest into? Or some other reason..

 

In iure ut molestiae repellat dicta ullam. Eos autem qui blanditiis sunt molestiae et.

Sit et laboriosam voluptatibus et aut. Consequatur quibusdam totam quo nihil.

Velit nobis libero sit. Ut quia fugiat saepe. Non est libero et quaerat reiciendis omnis qui. Dolor nihil saepe voluptatibus nulla aut. Explicabo distinctio laudantium fuga odio quisquam. Et est consequatur atque sit non rerum odio velit.

Repellendus sit non repudiandae praesentium atque earum. Non sint unde molestiae suscipit unde voluptatem non.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Lazard Freres No 98.9%
  • Perella Weinberg Partners New 98.3%
  • Harris Williams & Co. 24 97.7%
  • Goldman Sachs 16 97.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • William Blair 03 97.7%
  • Lazard Freres 06 97.2%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.9%
  • Perella Weinberg Partners 18 98.3%
  • JPMorgan Chase 06 97.7%
  • Moelis & Company 06 97.2%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (23) $378
  • Associates (95) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • 2nd Year Analyst (69) $168
  • Intern/Summer Associate (34) $167
  • 1st Year Analyst (213) $160
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (155) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”