CDD vs Private Equity Placement Agent

Evaluating two paths, with the end goal in a few years being working for a MM or LMM PE firm in a few years. Is commercial due diligence (think LEK) or private equity placement agent role better (think Park Hill). I know neither is the best best. The placement agent role seems like you get an okay modeling background but lack the total deal exposure the IB M&A gives you. A background in CDD really only gives you exposure to the market side (market size, growth models, etc.), though you're looking at a number of different target companies. I know both aren't ideal the best paths to getting to private equity but which would you take? Any advice or guidance would be helpful. 

 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, here's a breakdown of the two paths you're considering for a future in MM or LMM PE:

  1. Commercial Due Diligence (CDD) Role:

    • Pros: In a CDD role, such as those at firms like LEK, you gain deep insights into market dynamics, including market size, growth models, and competitive landscapes. This knowledge is crucial for PE firms when evaluating potential investments.
    • Cons: CDD roles typically lack comprehensive deal execution exposure. You primarily focus on the market and competitive analysis part of the deals, which might limit your understanding of other critical aspects like deal structuring and post-acquisition integration.
  2. Private Equity Placement Agent Role:

    • Pros: Working as a placement agent (e.g., at Park Hill) provides you with a broad view of the private equity landscape. You interact with both General Partners (GPs) and Limited Partners (LPs), which helps in understanding the fundraising aspect of PE. This role also involves some degree of financial modeling and deal exposure.
    • Cons: The role is more aligned with sales and relationship management rather than the core deal processes. You might lack the depth of deal-making experience that roles in investment banking or direct PE investing offer.

Recommendation: Given your end goal of working in a MM or LMM PE firm, the choice largely depends on where you want to strengthen your profile. If you aim to enhance your understanding of market dynamics and competitive analysis, which are valuable in the due diligence phase of PE deals, a CDD role could be beneficial. However, if you prefer to build a network within the PE industry and understand the financial aspects from a fundraising perspective, the placement agent role might be more suitable.

Neither path is a direct route to PE, as you noted, but both provide valuable skills that can be leveraged to transition into PE roles, especially in MM and LMM firms where versatility and a broad skill set can be particularly advantageous.

Sources: How to approach LMM PE recruiting?, Is it dumb to exit to LMM PE rather than starting in bigger (MF/UMM) opportunities first?, Private Funds Group (CS/UBS etc), My Path - MBA Banking Associate to PE, Why private equity practice vs. general practice?

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

Accusamus alias reiciendis quos soluta atque distinctio. Tempora doloremque facilis quis molestiae.

Necessitatibus cupiditate magnam aut at quia. Tempore et culpa quo assumenda id cum suscipit. Optio neque est et rerum odio.

Rem ducimus qui quae dicta. Voluptatem omnis corporis enim excepturi. Excepturi sint rem ipsa velit sunt eaque qui.

Natus autem reprehenderit unde temporibus quos. Est est non accusamus praesentium aut quia aut quo. Autem dicta ut et laboriosam animi amet praesentium. Ut laudantium eius unde cupiditate voluptatem est vel. Qui pariatur saepe unde modi aut dolores.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 99.0%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (22) $569
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (91) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (206) $268
  • 1st Year Associate (389) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (29) $154
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (316) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”