Piper Jaffray Bonus/Culture/etc

Alright, I know Piper gets ripped apart unmercifully here, but I would really appreciate some honest answers here. What I'm wondering is how their bonuses have been historically, particularly at the associate level.

  • Is pay in line with other MM banks (Baird, William Blair, Harris Williams, etc.)?
  • Does it vary much by office?
  • How dependent is it on how your individual group performs?

Any honest answers here would be much appreciated. It tough to do a search on this site to find real information on PJC because 99% of it is shit. Thanks in advance.

197 Comments
 
eastcoast1986It tough to do a search on this site to find real information on PJC because 99% of it is shit. Thanks in advance.
I find it absolutely hilarious that you just abbreviated Piper Jaffray as "PJC". The trolls have truly made their mark.
- Capt K - "Prestige is like a powerful magnet that warps even your beliefs about what you enjoy. If you want to make ambitious people waste their time on errands, bait the hook with prestige." - Paul Graham
 
CaptK
eastcoast1986It tough to do a search on this site to find real information on PJC because 99% of it is shit. Thanks in advance.
I find it absolutely hilarious that you just abbreviated Piper Jaffray as "PJC". The trolls have truly made their mark.
http://ayainsight.co/ Curating the best advice and making it actionable.
 
[Comment removed by mod team]
 
[Comment removed by mod team]
 
whateverittakes
James07PJC = PiperJaffrayChang
Yeah, I know that already. I just don't really see what's so funny about it if PJC is already their stock ticker and the acronym that they use. It's even their email domain. Thought there was something more.

This forum is the only place where people think using the ticker PJC is funny and it's because all the middle schoolers on this forum only know what they read and parrot on WSO.

Half the kids posting probably didn't even know Piper Jaffray was public.

 

i only know one person at PJC who did a little over a year in their ER, so not sure how helpful this is to you. he did not like the culture of his group and said that his bonus wasn't great but was roughly inline with comparable MM firms.

most of you are probably not old enough to remember/know that this firm used to be considered prestigious back in the old days. it's interesting how a firm's perceived place in the industry can change so drastically.

 
Affirmative_Action_Walrusthe only reason Piper Jaffray gets lambasted on here is b/c it has a funny name, is based in the Midwest, and of course, because of Piper Jeffrey Chang.

It's actually a respectable MM bank, good healthcare group

No, it was lambasted long before Pipar Jaffray Chiang came along, which led to his choosing of the name.

And it is strange to refer to it as "PJC," nobody does that in casual conversation when talking about PiperJaffray.

 
rebelcross
Affirmative_Action_Walrusthe only reason Piper Jaffray gets lambasted on here is b/c it has a funny name, is based in the Midwest, and of course, because of Piper Jeffrey Chang.

It's actually a respectable MM bank, good healthcare group

No, it was lambasted long before Pipar Jaffray Chiang came along, which led to his choosing of the name.

And it is strange to refer to it as "PJC," nobody does that in casual conversation when talking about PiperJaffray.

Piper Jeffrey Chang's continuous slapstick mockery of PJC has contributed to the overall lampoonery of PJC. It's an outcome that has created its own outcomes.

 

Given that it's a strong MM bank, you can probably assume that bonuses are comparable to the other MMs you mentioned. If you know or can find data about those banks, you'll have an idea of what Piper pays.

 
Affirmative_Action_WalrusGiven that it's a strong MM bank, you can probably assume that bonuses are comparable to the other MMs you mentioned. If you know or can find data about those banks, you'll have an idea of what Piper pays.

...Or it will be time to pay the Piper.

no but I think it's a decent MM bank. nothing bad about it really.

 

If I remember correctly, didn't the whole PJC-mockery bit start with LSO?

To the OP, apologies for not having any useful info. I've got a friend starting at an MM in a few weeks, but he's not even entirely sure of what he's expecting in terms of bonus, notwithstanding that there may be differences between that MM and PJC.

 
International Pymp
giants92Yea, LSO started it with the "that was so Piper Jaffray-ish of me"

This is correct. It's insane, but I think that LSO had a much more material impact on the reputation of Piper Jaffray than most people would care to admit. One line and a banks reputation gets fucked... that's power.

Haha, true.

http://ayainsight.co/ Curating the best advice and making it actionable.
 
[Comment removed by mod team]
 

Strong in equity, not so strong in M&A. Comparable to RBC, Stifel Weisel, Oppenheimer, Blair, Baird; less so Cowen and others. Going through a lot of changes right now, much like many of the aforementioned banks.

MM in general really has to reinvent itself as a business model, too. Their overhead is comparable to the bulge (large ECM and other product groups), but the fees are not. Barely anyone does multi-billion dollar deals that bring in those lucrative fees. And yet the junior staff are demanding the same pay as the street - but you can't please everybody and the rise of EBs and sub-EBs is creeping in onto the territory. It's tough out there.

 
MalakariOh my bad, I missed an E. I guess that invalidates my whole premise. Nice try though.

Haha we were sending out a contract of approved brokers for one of our clients to sign at a place I was interning a few summers back. An intern spelled it without the E - no one noticed, except the client who made a point to make fun of the MD. Hell was unleashed on him, but given that this is an internet forum I think we can let it slide.

 
[Comment removed by mod team]
 

Also I've met some of the analysts there, very unprofessional. Not saying the entire firm, just the select few that the firm somehow felt represented them when I visited last year... go figure.

 
MrLondonplease excuse my ignorance: LSO?

Leveraged Sell-Out. Satirical blog about banking, now defunct. Also wrote "Damn It's Good To Be A Banker." Don't take a word of it seriously though... (except, fine, Goldman IS more prestigious than Piper...)

 

They also acquired Seattle-Northwest about a year ago. While it may not boost their reputation, it will provide them with increased scale for a product (municipal bonds) that provides good profit margins and steady cash flow for a firm.

As for why their reputation is what it is, I can think of a few reasons:

  1. They're in an awkward position from a strategic perspective. They're larger (in terms of market cap.) than a lot of other middle market firms, but they aren't large enough to really get noticed, and they don't specialize in one particular area. They're known for healthcare, and I would argue that consumer (particularly ECM) is strong, but they also have a lot of resources dedicated to other areas that they aren't particularly strong in.
  2. They have a lot of competition in their home market of the Midwest. William Blair in Chicago and R.W. Baird in Milwaukee are both solid middle market firms that are often competing for the same clients that Piper is, not to mention numerous other small and mid-size firms.
  3. How many small-cap healthcare IPOs have they put their name on recently? Deal flow is great, but in terms of your reputation, it helps when the companies involved are more well-established.
  4. They attempted to expand to Hong Kong several years ago, only to reverse course and close most of their operations there. To make a name for themselves, they need to prove that they can deliver.

My personal verdict: For someone living in Minneapolis, or someone that isn't able to get into a BB or larger middle market firm, it may be a great place to work. I would happily go to work there, despite all of the issues that I just mentioned, because I believe the company has a lot of potential. They have the resources, all they need is time and a little direction.

 

The biggest problem stems from the talent bleed, which got worse when it was spun off from US Bank. It has long been known to be a sweatshop, part of the reason PJC Corp Dev groups are also far worse than peers (e.g. UHC). When talent is moving out of the business, you lose those valuable connections that help land deals. PJC pitches on many, but outside of HC (where it kept solid talent), it struggles.

Still, it did manage to land Portillo's this year, along with a few other decent C&R and Industrials deals.

 

wrong thread

Currently: future neurologist, current psychotherapist Previously: investor relations (top consulting firm), M&A consulting (Big 4), M&A banking (MM)
 

Agree. Most people would take Piper w/o hesitation.

In an unrelated topic, it's kind of like choosing bulbasaur as a starter - sure he/she has their good matchups, but you'll never be as good or prestigious as a blastoise who knows earthquake or charizard that knows overheat. Plus you get wrecked by every fire pokemon out there and no amount of giga drains will help you in the long run.

speed boost blaze
 
Magneton

Agree. Most people would take Piper w/o hesitation.

In an unrelated topic, it's kind of like choosing bulbasaur as a starter - sure he/she has their good matchups, but you'll never be as good or prestigious as a blastoise who knows earthquake or charizard that knows overheat. Plus you get wrecked by every fire pokemon out there and no amount of giga drains will help you in the long run.

lmao.

 
Magneton

Agree. Most people would take Piper w/o hesitation.

In an unrelated topic, it's kind of like choosing bulbasaur as a starter - sure he/she has their good matchups, but you'll never be as good or prestigious as a blastoise who knows earthquake or charizard that knows overheat. Plus you get wrecked by every fire pokemon out there and no amount of giga drains will help you in the long run.

I seriously hope that you last longer than mudkipz

in it 2 win it
 

Such a Piper Jaffray post. Bro, chip on your shoulder is showing, jus' FYI.

Ace all your PE interview questions with the WSO Private Equity Prep Pack: http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/guide/private-equity-interview-prep-questions
 

I would second that post. I don't understand all the hate. One reason might be a name similar to Jefferies. I know people at PJC from MDs to Analysts and they love their firm. My school tends to have many people high up at PJC and it really is a top notch bank. Haters gonna hate but PJC is not a bad bank to work at. I wish they employed international students! +1SB for you and finally someone had balls to say it out loud.

 
Beny23

I would second that post. I don't understand all the hate. One reason might be a name similar to Jefferies. I know people at PJC from MDs to Analysts and they love their firm. My school tends to have many people high up at PJC and it really is a top notch bank. Haters gonna hate but PJC is not a bad bank to work at. I wish they employed international students!

I've seen the consensus on WSO that the hate started with that article on LSO.

Second what you said about PJC. Emailed recruiter asking about intl' students hiring policy after PJC acquired Edgeview, but still received a no.

Nothing is true; everything is permitted.
 
Beny23

I would second that post. I don't understand all the hate. One reason might be a name similar to Jefferies. I know people at PJC from MDs to Analysts and they love their firm. My school tends to have many people high up at PJC and it really is a top notch bank. Haters gonna hate but PJC is not a bad bank to work at. I wish they employed international students! +1SB for you and finally someone had balls to say it out loud.

Beny, people at Piper clearly don't love their firm. The turnover is among the worst in IB, let alone at the MM level. All of the top MDs get poached away or voluntarily find other opportunities. If you look at the firms that are doing well in MPLS, many MDs at the top were top guys at Piper pre-split. Analysts and associates bolt for UHC, 3M or anywhere else they can land.

Piper's M&A deal flow is a joke. Every year removed from the split with US Bank, Piper seems to get worse. Comp will continue to be suppressed and hours are getting worse and worse. It has a terrible reputation for being a sweatshop and having a terrible culture.

And this goes beyond the IB side, since it just announced a bunch of layoffs, including those on the fixed income side (not surprising).

That being said, if you have no other alternatives and you get an offer, you try and stick it out for a year, preferably on HC (strongest deal flow still), and then move to Corp Dev, another IB, MM PE, etc.

 
Beny23

I would second that post. I don't understand all the hate. One reason might be a name similar to Jefferies. I know people at PJC from MDs to Analysts and they love their firm. My school tends to have many people high up at PJC and it really is a top notch bank. Haters gonna hate but PJC is not a bad bank to work at. I wish they employed international students! +1SB for you and finally someone had balls to say it out loud.

Come on man, you're doing that whole "talking out of your ass" thing again. We need you to do less of it.

Under my tutelage, you will grow from boys to men. From men into gladiators. And from gladiators into SWANSONS.
 

I was about to make fun of Piper Jaffray, but then I realized that I dont have a FT offer and would gladly accept one at PJ....

"They’re all former investment bankers who were laid off in the economic crash that Nancy Pelosi caused. They’ve got zero real-world skills, but God they work hard." -Jack Donaghy
 

I won't until you make a video of you in tears and it goes viral. It worked for Britney.....did it? I dunno, but worth a shot.

"After you work on Wall Street it’s a choice, would you rather work at McDonalds or on the sell-side? I would choose McDonalds over the sell-side.” - David Tepper
 
YOLO banker

I think my original point was lost in all the banter and MS, so I am going to say it again:

Piper Jaffray is a top-notch global bank, strong deals, and is just as good as Jeffries - so quit making fun, haters

It's Jefferies you diglett.

speed boost blaze
 
YOLO banker

Piper Jaffray is a top-notch global bank, strong deals, and is just as good as Jeffries - so quit making fun, haters

I'm entirely indifferent to PJ's existence, so no hate here. Just want to correct one point: having a London and Zurich office on top of 100 US offices (most of them small-market cities) does NOT make you a global bank.

“Millionaires don't use astrology, billionaires do”
 

Piper is at severe compensation and exit op disadvantage at least here in the midwest. Can't speak on Philly or other offices but 1. they used to have one of the biggest trading desks in the region, now it is a shell of its former self 2. and how is this killing it? http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB100008723963904439314045775490302… 3. Piper's health care practice is arguably the best in the MM and if that is your focus I would agree that is top notch, other than that it is the butt of jokes around here

 

@YOLOBanker did you forget that Bob Peterson (head of equities) left for JC Penny. JC PENNY!?!?!?! Are you kidding we laughed about that one as a sign of the times at PJC....

 

JC Penny is going to make a strong comeback just wait. I shop there and I can say from personal experience that they have made some great changes since Ackman left. If I had some extra money laying around I'd totally buy up a ton of their shares.

 

You just went from clueless to full blown retard in under 3 seconds.

Under my tutelage, you will grow from boys to men. From men into gladiators. And from gladiators into SWANSONS.
 

Piper Jaffray is a very well respected MM bank with good deal flow. Yeah their deal amounts are less then IB, but their teams are smaller and more personalized which evens it out.

 
CS'14

Piper Jaffray is a very well respected MM bank with good deal flow. Yeah their deal amounts are less then IB, but their teams are smaller and more personalized which evens it out.

i believe you meant to post this in past tense. Their deal amounts are less than "IB"? What does that even mean? Median deal values? Typical MM deal size?

They are taking on M&A deals in the $20-$30 million range because they cannot win other mandates.

 
slavemaster5000

Better exposure to what? Unsophisticated valuations? Crappy pitch books? No execution? Do you guys even have a print center or is professional printing and binding a bullet on your resume?

I bind my own pitch books. Ballin' on a budget mfer.

"For I am a sinner in the hands of an angry God. Bloody Mary full of vodka, blessed are you among cocktails. Pray for me now and at the hour of my death, which I hope is soon. Amen."
 

this is the real reason why current IB analysts like to make fun of Piper Jefferies. I always pronounced it Piper "JAFray," but everytime I meet a banker from there, they look at me square in the eyes and say, "It's Piper JAH-fray," please get it right. Then they seem to get a self-fulfilled sense of pride every time they say "JAH-fray." It's a little bit weird.

 

I would kill to work at Piper Jaffray. No hate on an amazing organization. Was born in Minneapolis, and was back there last summer after I graduated. Biggest Bank in the city by far. I seriously can't get anyone from them to respond to me, and no one In the city seems to know anyone. Yolo, look me up, would love to get a foot in the door.

 

Piper has a job listing on my school's business career center. The salary Range is 60-75K for an investment banking analyst. I assume that is base pay but the job listing does not specify.

This is for the following locations: West (CA, NV, UT, CO, MT, WY, AZ, NM, WA, OR, ID), East (ME, NH, VT, MA, CT, RI, NY, NJ, PA, DE, MD, DC, VA), Minneapolis/StPaul & Surrounding Area, Chicago & Surrounding Area

 

Their banking revenue has decreased this past quarter. New partnership with CIT should be beneficial to help offer a bigger product line. Am curious to see how that plays out.

 
JasonLoh@peinvestor2012 Alright thanks! Do they have a strong grip on the Minnestora and healthcare corporations? Also, which companies have the strongest M&A group, and which have the most exposure globally? ?

Yes, didn't I state that they have good deal flow in healthcare and MN?

What do you mean by which companies have the strongest M&A groups and global exposure? Are you talking IB? Are you talking specifically MM IB?

 

@peinvestor

Hahaha ignore my first question. As for my second question, which MM firm are considered the most high regarded in the IB world?

 
JasonLoh@peinvestor

Hahaha ignore my first question. As for my second question, which MM firm are considered the most high regarded in the IB world?

Realize that if you purely want international transactions and exposure, BBs or elite boutiques (Greenhill, Moelis, Centerview, etc.) are going to be the best bet.

There are a ton of MM IBs, some larger and some smaller. I'd say the best are probably William Blair, Baird, Harris Williams, Piper Jaffray, KBW/Stifel, Houlihan, SunTrust, Cowen, Jefferies.

Note, when you move to the MM, there are some nuances. For instance, Piper is a strong in healthcare, KBW/Stifel is primarily FIG focused, SunTrust is strong regionally (Southeast).

 

Laboriosam quisquam iusto quo enim alias reprehenderit. Amet et non laboriosam minima nesciunt non. Ea id eligendi quisquam nisi. Delectus maiores quo soluta nam aliquam. Saepe ratione ad rem enim quia maiores.

Aspernatur dolorum numquam maxime incidunt. Inventore excepturi quia sit numquam consequuntur. In eius accusantium ipsam quia. Et qui eveniet sapiente dolorem qui ut.

Voluptatum eum aut sunt itaque. Rerum nulla ullam qui omnis molestiae. Perspiciatis deleniti iste rerum sapiente rerum. Est enim nostrum vel.

Dicta odit culpa quo et facere. Neque explicabo et perspiciatis ipsum harum velit dolores rerum. Tempore et quod quas fugiat maxime ut esse.

 

Et tempore voluptates vel neque omnis fuga. Ut delectus sequi laudantium eius. Ab aperiam et unde dolores. Voluptatem ad laboriosam sit ex sit cupiditate laudantium voluptatem. Rerum cum reprehenderit dolorem ut.

Non molestias qui neque dolor corporis et. Rerum incidunt exercitationem omnis modi enim molestiae dolorum. Excepturi similique explicabo quia ratione laboriosam tempora quo. Provident et mollitia rerum sed dolor consequuntur sit.

Voluptatem pariatur fuga molestiae expedita omnis aperiam magni. Consequatur inventore facilis libero ad. Et sint eaque odio consequatur id qui tempora. Asperiores molestias consectetur nostrum accusamus.

 

Voluptatem ad dolor modi voluptatem perspiciatis. Perspiciatis ex expedita reiciendis impedit non. Tempore excepturi harum tempore dolor enim odit quas. Non deleniti ex sit cupiditate debitis dolor voluptas.

Asperiores laborum non beatae consequatur. Labore mollitia itaque architecto quia. Dolorem consequuntur placeat optio placeat error labore voluptas. Harum quas doloribus ad voluptas sunt eos soluta accusamus.

Est labore dolorem libero rem. Dolore vitae et aliquam odio laudantium culpa repudiandae. Dolores dolor similique praesentium aperiam odio velit. Nulla sint illo fugit temporibus saepe quidem. Sint et tempora modi voluptatibus libero. Dolorum laborum sed dolorum qui nisi.

Wall Street leaders now understand that they made a mistake, one born of their innocent and trusting nature. They trusted ordinary Americans to behave more responsibly than they themselves ever would, and these ordinary Americans betrayed their trust.
 

Qui eum sed nostrum voluptatem. Quis delectus hic ipsam minima omnis alias. Asperiores modi fugiat magni dolorem facilis nisi voluptas. Possimus culpa maiores placeat laborum omnis.

Dolorem recusandae et perferendis odit asperiores molestiae. Et qui ea reiciendis cumque totam eligendi. Qui non repellat dignissimos est provident. Quas ducimus eveniet quia libero enim.

Et necessitatibus facere modi officiis. Officia sit ex aliquid nulla beatae doloribus aperiam. Vitae molestiae consequatur ut enim recusandae est. Atque nihil commodi est quibusdam.

 

Recusandae quo minus quia repellendus sint excepturi. Repellat quia nisi ipsa quis praesentium. Dolor sit eum et cumque autem.

Velit consectetur ab alias in sit culpa. Aliquid qui delectus maiores eos quia.

Ex quia nulla qui est eum. Voluptatem reprehenderit tempora vitae. Labore sed repudiandae incidunt. Reprehenderit ullam laudantium natus ex velit. Aut sint similique aut omnis eum quos.

Assumenda quia fuga autem unde cupiditate similique incidunt. Iusto omnis illo dolorem.

 

Eum itaque mollitia voluptates porro ut. Hic et fugit et et quo consectetur ipsam architecto. Dolor perferendis iure voluptatibus et impedit.

Est dolores voluptatibus quibusdam. Est ut non modi ut dolore repudiandae. Sit alias ea enim cum. Et et et enim.

Delectus dolores nihil aut consectetur voluptates dolorem. Hic et rerum repellendus rerum dolore. Quisquam sint voluptates impedit enim et commodi. Molestiae non veniam veritatis doloremque natus.

Quo quia voluptatum iusto non blanditiis ea natus et. Et nesciunt sed rerum. Placeat non excepturi nobis voluptas nihil magni nobis.

 

Asperiores maxime inventore illo quos. Perferendis labore vel et eaque ratione. Laudantium et non voluptas et. Deleniti ea rerum tenetur unde. Eius possimus voluptatem aut deleniti totam. Facilis placeat quisquam ipsam saepe eum corporis repellat.

Ratione suscipit placeat eaque nostrum ut quo minus. Occaecati eos ullam cumque unde et. Dolor corporis reiciendis repellendus non.

Inventore alias ut modi officia eveniet fugiat. Possimus quia rerum accusamus fuga veritatis. Dolores aut animi tempora nihil suscipit architecto libero error. Dolorum id ullam sed. Autem et odit et laudantium porro odit.

Molestiae recusandae nihil maxime et similique qui ipsum maiores. Exercitationem velit fuga commodi ducimus. Est doloribus possimus earum eveniet vitae. Quod magni eos et possimus.

 

Earum iure dolor voluptate in voluptates possimus illum. Id sed dignissimos voluptatem quia at voluptas. Ipsa sed quaerat voluptatem officiis maxime et. Et nulla qui tempora quia. Sed et corporis quia nostrum tempore et.

Alias dolor nemo nemo eum tenetur earum animi. Ipsum ut dolor qui nesciunt dolores quia accusamus. Dolor voluptatum nulla sunt sit dolor nihil et. Excepturi minima aut voluptas rerum minus voluptas ratione. Quia ex totam rerum similique repellendus quia nulla.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”