Hello fellow monkeys,
I am in the interview process for an experienced analyst role at Tishman Speyer and the next phase of the process is the modeling test.
Has anyone taken a modeling test for Tishman Speyer that can provide me with any information? Such as: asset class, development or acquisition, waterfall, and etc?
I have searched online and have found nothing.
I am very thankful for anything you guys can share.
| +72 | Hiring Analyst/Associate - Advice | 32 | 3h | |
| +44 | Current CRE Phase | 19 | 3d | |
| +40 | Laid Off - Multifamily Acquisitions Help | 9 | 13h | |
| +26 | Best Brokerages in South Florida | 18 | 1d | |
| +26 | Capital Formation | 9 | 4d | |
| +25 | PART 2: Increasing RE Industry's Cash Compensation, Collectively | 1 | 5d | |
| How many days a week are you expected to be in the office? | 23 | 1d | ||
| +23 | NYU MSRE Program | 7 | 3d | |
| +22 | UK Development | 4 | 1d | |
| +21 | Is construction profitable? How do you raise capital? | 4 | 28m |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Following
I have a copy of the test from last spring. Let me see I I can figure out how to post and will share a link
Please share
Interested, can I pm u?
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/osg7gvzd3h2c4v0ms8hgw/TS-Modeling-Exerci…
Do you have the solution for this model?
Working on this now, for fun. Do we know if the lease rate is FS or NNN? Just trying to figure out if OpEx is reimbursed by the tenant. If so, would free rent be fully abated or just on the base rent?
Thanks so much for sharing!
For fun....
.... On a Friday.....
.... Dear God......
I'd assume FS, since the lease and market rate seem kind of high to be NNN.
Have you solved it?
do you have the completed version?
do you have the completed version?
How was your modeling test?
What kind of questions did you get asked in the model walk-through?
Hey all - just completed the latest version from TS for their "Experienced Analyst" role in SF. Exactly the same test as the linked excel file above. The only difference is the requirement to run a single tiered waterfall structure and create a 1-pager that summarizes all findings.
Thank you this is super helpful, I have an interview coming up now for the same program. Btw, is it just me or is the model template shared above messed up with the dates being weird (some start of month others month end?)
Thank you for the heads up, would it be possible for you to share solved test? I'm trying to check if I've got the same values in my waterfall.
Do you have a copy of the completed test?
Have you interviewed?
How much time was given to complete this?
2 hours
Having trouble figuring out the case study that someone commented before. I already built out my cash flows but I’m lost on how to back into a purchase price and subsequent loan amount at 65% that produces a 15% levered IRR. Can anyone help here?
Can you use goal seek?
Tried that. Doesn’t work.
take year 1 noi and divide by a cap rate to get hypothetical PP. build cashflows and loan amount based off hypothetical PP. then set Lev IRR to .15 by changing cell Purchase price. have loan amount directly tie to that same purchase price cell. hope that helps
Thanks. It works. I thought there woulda been another way but I was just overthinking
Molestias aliquam culpa et ut. Sed reprehenderit et vitae et accusamus. Dolor ut laudantium rerum totam. Voluptatem quis esse animi pariatur qui fugiat officia.
Provident voluptatum excepturi aliquam odio praesentium. Voluptas quaerat minus consequatur quas laboriosam nihil autem. Sed eveniet corrupti dolor officiis. Est nemo eum ipsum pariatur ab enim ipsa.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Officiis libero tempore quis. Quam tempore itaque dolores commodi et in eos numquam. Porro vel fugit voluptas occaecati. Ipsum aut neque quia sit id asperiores.
Provident consequuntur assumenda non qui. At saepe molestiae quos vero corporis aspernatur dolor. Quisquam earum iusto aliquam sint voluptas. Molestiae recusandae incidunt dignissimos inventore id fugiat. Repellendus et illo nisi possimus et aut in earum. Ipsam impedit qui repellendus ipsa voluptas pariatur asperiores.
Eveniet distinctio quia occaecati. Qui ut sunt laboriosam incidunt. Eum alias qui sed ipsam accusantium delectus vel. Eaque dolorem sapiente quia ut.
Similique reprehenderit beatae repellat voluptas. Quaerat deserunt voluptate natus ut magni omnis nobis. Ea eius voluptates sapiente quisquam mollitia officia est. Amet corporis est quod ea et facere. Et et ducimus architecto voluptates autem doloremque id.