Most Helpful

Would not say that this is necessarily correct. Fund statutes often say something like "invest in equity of the company or selectively in debt securities of a target in control situations / to obtain control". Clearly not the right wording but you get what I am trying to say.

I am working at a regular large cap buyout fund, but we have this wording in the statutes, so do others. We have done it before (successfully) and would usually look into it if the debt reaches a certain trading level.

 

Lately you see instances of large cap sponsors participating heavily in the junior debt of their portcos. Then as the portcos struggle (esp in tech), these portcos and sponsors are buying small chunks of their 1L trading in the 70s and 2L trading in the 40-60s. Buying small positions strikes me as a pure value play. Would you need to make large purchases to have a seat at the table as a creditor in a LME or restructuring scenario? 

Life is more than dollars
 

Two reasons come to mind:

1) It is a good value play (e.g. the debt is cheap and the Company wants more exposure) 2) Rx Considerations: it may be advantageous to have a seat at the table on the creditor side when a PortCo goes through a restructuring...or certain debt might be unique that has better negotiating power and makes sense to own some of that debt

 

Wasn’t just Apollo. Strategy paid big dividends post-crisis. Cross fund issues are also less sticky than you might think as many fund docs explicitly anticipated this scenario. In many cases (not all) how flagship fund and debt split distressed investments in portco is spelled out in the fund documents.

 

Did Apollo buy Apollo portco debt primarily because they 1) knew portcos would make it and the debt was a great value play, Apollo would put money in if needed, etc? Or 2) Apollo bought PortCo A debt so they could block a lender proposal that was undesirable to Apollo, thus paying a few bucks of insurance by buying portco debt. Then using that "insurance" to make sure Apollo PE got the best deal via blocking votes?

Life is more than dollars
 

Vero quo esse laudantium. Esse est nulla rem quia natus ut dolores. Dolorem et tenetur fugiat sit tempora aut. Occaecati accusamus et ipsum. Aut magnam est repellat expedita velit et accusamus. Error et excepturi et.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 99.0%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (22) $569
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (91) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (206) $268
  • 1st Year Associate (389) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (29) $154
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (316) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”