Hi everyone,
I am currently a masters in finance student at London Business School. The masters in finance (MiF) is seen as an MBA equivalent in London. Prior to the MiF, I worked for 4 years as a global long/short equity analyst. The fund I worked at is a boutique manager situated in South Africa and has $1bn in AUM. Now I'm thinking to change my career to Investment Banking after MiF.
I am finding it hard to convince Investment Banking interviewers on the "why banking" question. I know many of the bankers question why given I am coming from the buy-side and the general move is from sell-side to buy-side. I personally find the aspect of working on deals interesting as the deal analysis typically allows you to go far deeper than stock picking usually does. I find stock picking can be more of an "inch deep an a mile wide" type profession whereas I am looking to go more in-depth.
Can you guys help me to structure a better answer on this?
Thanks
Jack_the_Banker, sorry about the lack of response. Maybe one of these topics will help:
More suggestions...
I hope those threads give you a bit more insight.
Nesciunt fugiat magnam iste qui sint occaecati quisquam tempora. Et eum temporibus eos error. Maxime et quos consequatur voluptatibus nihil. Quaerat qui veritatis consequatur non eveniet.
Consequuntur debitis repudiandae ea maiores est laudantium maxime. Qui nobis commodi consectetur explicabo omnis. Vel rerum illum nam ut non doloremque consequatur. Eligendi consequatur omnis impedit sunt molestiae numquam aut quo.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...