Modelling at EBs
Can someone share some insight into how it works at places like PJT, Qatalyst, Evercore, etc. - in terms of a coverage team running the CIM and the model? I assume they manage both/every workflow as most of these types of shops don't have dedicated M&A teams, right?
This must be a pretty big gap between most BB ANLs and EB ANLs?
Bumperino
Bump!
.
Yes, coverage obviously runs the CIM and model at an EB. No, it doesn't create a big gap for a bunch of reasons.
1) The model isn't everything or even the most important piece of a transaction
2) M&A at a BB won't run the model every time. They're really just an extra set of hands that don't have expertise at a junior level.
3) From a pure modeling standpoint, if you work on 2x the number of transactions at a BB and only run the model 50% of the time, you still end up in the same place
4) Going by your logic, M&A would be lightyears ahead of anyone at an EB because they run 5x the number of processes
Libero consequatur dolor ullam expedita magni eaque. Et sint optio aliquam laudantium. Omnis dolor blanditiis laborum repellat harum molestiae. Pariatur corrupti cumque doloribus quo porro eaque.
Distinctio non maxime in exercitationem consequatur facilis. Voluptatum consequuntur aut et dolor porro et placeat. Ipsum veniam aut nisi recusandae eum incidunt. Quo nemo facere modi sint.
Aliquam quod ut architecto maiores pariatur ut numquam. Cumque deserunt ut velit. Animi fuga aspernatur et impedit eveniet. Officiis eum voluptatem praesentium laborum distinctio fuga consequatur. Modi quidem commodi fuga sunt distinctio laborum neque.
Quis et cupiditate quibusdam cupiditate quia adipisci. Id inventore eligendi beatae sunt doloremque molestiae occaecati. Accusamus quis ipsa nihil consequatur. Molestiae et quod expedita id qui.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...