3, 9, 14, 12, 36, 41, ?
Got this in an interview lol
Got this in an interview lol
+27 | Fastes PM progression ever seen? | 31 | 1d | |
+21 | Recommend Pass for MM HF Case Study | 6 | 9h | |
+20 | Track Record Expectation For PM's | 29 | 2d | |
+17 | How extroverted is the junior MMHF job? | 5 | 4d | |
+17 | Why don't MMs do any activism? | 11 | 1d | |
+16 | HF perspective on Google (Alphabet) | 5 | 4d | |
+14 | Are you making money these days? | 9 | 9h | |
+13 | Credit Pods | 6 | 11h | |
+12 | Point72 Academy Case Study | 11 | 20h | |
+11 | Stephen Moyer- Distressed debt analysis | 5 | 3d |
Career Resources
39. its x3, +5, -2
39? lol
I don't think you have enough data points to conclude the pattern is -2 in the middle
u dont have enough data points to conclude anything with certainty in public markets investing. If you want to have absolute answers go be an engineer
69
Looks like:
3*3 = 9
9 (+ 5) = 14
14 (- 2) = 12
12*3 = 36
36 (+ 5) = 41
41 (- 2) = 39
So next number is 39? Then continue the process of multiplying by 3, adding 5, subtracting 2. Not entirely sure and could theorize a few other ways but this is first thought.
180?
Trick question the actual sequence is 4, 8, 15, 16, 23, 42
I guess someone really wanted to test your ability to pick up on sequential growth patterns/seasonality?
edit - haha nvm, for some reason on step 3. was doing 3 * 4 + 2= 14, I'm thinking it might be something like the above as a recursive function
Exercitationem aspernatur et quae id. Enim sunt molestiae aliquid atque quibusdam. Fugit porro quis minima repellat et.
Aut aliquam iste repellat quae deleniti sed nisi numquam. Quod quis libero exercitationem fugiat quia non. Ipsa nobis quis vitae molestiae et culpa.
Doloremque aperiam recusandae molestiae quis sit. Quis voluptate tempore sit et veritatis enim id.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...