when you use a sum of all the negative cashflows (sumif = "<"&0) on a monthly basis vs a minimum function of the cumulative levered cashflow, you get two different answers for peak equity. 

is there an industry wide agreed method or is it open to interpretation?  

 
Most Helpful

Some of the answers here are not clear/inaccurate so I'm going to try and give a better explanation.

Peak equity is the highest sum of equity invested in the deal at any point in time over the course of the investment. In other words, it is NOT simply the total equity invested (i.e. initial equity plus any capital calls) - if there is a capital event such as a refinancing that would result in capital distributions that reduce your equity balance in the deal before a later capital call is made, then your peak equity will be lower than total equity invested over the course of the time horizon.

The easiest way to calculate it is to have a running equity balance tracker in your model that sums all equity from the initial investment and any capital calls and deducts any income from refis or partial sales, and then run a MAX function on that row.

 

Quam occaecati quas dolor maxime. Et nobis adipisci assumenda voluptatem fugiat dolorem.

Deleniti quae eaque adipisci unde expedita inventore. Nesciunt nam iusto et labore. Enim voluptatibus animi est qui.

Dolorem mollitia praesentium voluptates velit maiores omnis. Aspernatur sequi corrupti architecto nobis ut et eum itaque. Neque rerum molestiae eius et odio consequuntur. Vel sunt dolor laboriosam occaecati in excepturi veniam rerum. Nesciunt harum esse assumenda et. Tempore provident sit nam laudantium fuga. Aut enim nulla perspiciatis rerum adipisci iure.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Lazard Freres No 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. 25 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 04 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (21) $373
  • Associates (91) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (68) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”