<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://wallstreetoasis.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
<channel>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://wallstreetoasis.com/usercontent/876</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Plus / Minus Points On Posts</title>
 <link>http://wallstreetoasis.com/forums/plus-minus-points-on-posts</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Patrick,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This has been brought up before but I thought I would rehash it since nobody has really pushed for it lately.  I think a lot of the malcontent with the state of the website has alot to do with the quality of the threads as well as the content of the posting within them (and arguably, the posters themselves).  People are a little wary to trust what is being posted, despite the &quot;gold star&quot; system you&#039;ve implemented.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So if I may suggest again the plus or minus point system where each member can vote on whether or not another member&#039;s post or response was helpful to them, it may help those actually looking for advice to weed through the BS.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Another option may be that only gold star users and the original poster him/herself can vote on the helpfulness of the post, that way you can have a better sample set.  Just a thought.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://wallstreetoasis.com/forums/plus-minus-points-on-posts#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://wallstreetoasis.com/crss/node/27837</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://wallstreetoasis.com/taxonomy/term/3">Site Suggestions</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:39:50 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>GameTheory</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">27837 at http://wallstreetoasis.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Relationships</title>
 <link>http://wallstreetoasis.com/forums/relationships-0</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Just curious, and I fully realize that this topic has been glazed over peripherally through the course of some of the threads in this forum.  But based on my own recent personal experiences and conversations, I was wondering:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1) In terms of your criteria in a significant other, do you require a high level of substance (intellectually, culturally, social-economically) as well as a requisite for physical attraction, or is chemistry your only requirement?  To put it another way, would you date someone who perhaps didn&#039;t go to college, and didn&#039;t contribute heavily to any deep conversations, so long as you had very good chemistry (however vaguely defined)?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2) Is there a double standard for men and women when it comes to this?  Is it easier for a man to date what I just described above than a woman?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://wallstreetoasis.com/forums/relationships-0#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://wallstreetoasis.com/crss/node/27249</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://wallstreetoasis.com/taxonomy/term/8">Monkeying Around</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 12:07:32 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>GameTheory</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">27249 at http://wallstreetoasis.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Monthly Budgets</title>
 <link>http://wallstreetoasis.com/forums/monthly-budgets</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Just curious, if you&#039;re willing to offer up the basic info:  What is your current position and would you say you are mostly cash flow positive or cash flow negative on a monthly basis?  How many of you are negative during the month and make up for it at the end of the year with your bonus?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://wallstreetoasis.com/forums/monthly-budgets#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://wallstreetoasis.com/crss/node/26178</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://wallstreetoasis.com/taxonomy/term/8">Monkeying Around</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 11:46:15 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>GameTheory</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">26178 at http://wallstreetoasis.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>CalPERs and CalSTERs</title>
 <link>http://wallstreetoasis.com/forums/calpers-and-calsters</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Pretty glad this guy, and the SEIU, got put in their respective places.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sacbee.com/103/story/850590.html&quot; title=&quot;http://www.sacbee.com/103/story/850590.html&quot;&gt;http://www.sacbee.com/103/story/850590.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;quote-msg&quot;&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;quote-author&quot;&gt;Quote:&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Opposed by the state&#039;s two public pension funds and Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, an assemblyman withdrew a bill Wednesday that would have prevented the funds from investing in private-equity firms partly owned by foreign governments with poor human-rights records.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://wallstreetoasis.com/forums/calpers-and-calsters&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://wallstreetoasis.com/forums/calpers-and-calsters#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://wallstreetoasis.com/crss/node/18956</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://wallstreetoasis.com/taxonomy/term/5">Private Iniquity</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 17:29:16 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>GameTheory</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">18956 at http://wallstreetoasis.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>MBA correlation with PE</title>
 <link>http://wallstreetoasis.com/forums/mba-correlation-with-pe</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;This obviously will not put the argument to rest, but may be useful to check out.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Undergrad degrees and MBA by school per 6 top tier funds.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bankersball.com/2008/02/26/private-equity-firms-universities-whats-the-relationship/&quot; title=&quot;http://www.bankersball.com/2008/02/26/private-equity-firms-universities-whats-the-relationship/&quot;&gt;http://www.bankersball.com/2008/02/26/private-equity-firms-universities-...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://wallstreetoasis.com/forums/mba-correlation-with-pe#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://wallstreetoasis.com/crss/node/15472</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://wallstreetoasis.com/taxonomy/term/5">Private Iniquity</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 10:57:33 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>GameTheory</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">15472 at http://wallstreetoasis.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Centerview featured in Dealbook</title>
 <link>http://wallstreetoasis.com/forums/centerview-featured-in-dealbook</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Haven&#039;t heard many people on this board inquiring about this boutique, but Dealbook has a feature on Effron and Centerview that seems pretty comprehensive.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://wallstreetoasis.com/forums/centerview-featured-in-dealbook&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://wallstreetoasis.com/forums/centerview-featured-in-dealbook#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://wallstreetoasis.com/crss/node/15067</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://wallstreetoasis.com/taxonomy/term/26">I-Banking Bullpen</category>
 <enclosure url="http://wallstreetoasis.com/image/view/15079/preview" length="5272" type="image/jpeg" />
 <pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 10:04:29 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>GameTheory</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">15067 at http://wallstreetoasis.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Public Perception of Private Equity: A Discussion</title>
 <link>http://wallstreetoasis.com/forums/public-perception-of-private-equity-a-discussion</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s become quite clear to me recently that the general public has a perception of private equity that goes beyond any negative connotations associated with banking.  People have a general understanding that private equity partners have the ability to create the kind of wealth (for themselves, it seems) that borders on the obscene at the expense of, well, them.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://wallstreetoasis.com/forums/public-perception-of-private-equity-a-discussion&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://wallstreetoasis.com/forums/public-perception-of-private-equity-a-discussion#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://wallstreetoasis.com/crss/node/13142</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://wallstreetoasis.com/taxonomy/term/5">Private Iniquity</category>
 <enclosure url="http://wallstreetoasis.com/image/view/13148/preview" length="5613" type="image/jpeg" />
 <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 11:21:51 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>GameTheory</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">13142 at http://wallstreetoasis.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Bain</title>
 <link>http://wallstreetoasis.com/forums/bain</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;While I didn&#039;t target Bain in my job search, I never saw any job postings for them, either.  I know Bain, Golden Gate, etc.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://wallstreetoasis.com/forums/bain&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://wallstreetoasis.com/forums/bain#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://wallstreetoasis.com/crss/node/12579</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://wallstreetoasis.com/taxonomy/term/5">Private Iniquity</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 17:23:44 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>GameTheory</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">12579 at http://wallstreetoasis.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Campus Recruiting</title>
 <link>http://wallstreetoasis.com/forums/campus-recruiting</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;For those wishing to return to private equity post B-school, do most people reach out through their own contacts or is there a formal recruiting process? Which firms generally visit campuses and participate in on-campus recruiting through the career services department?  What has placement been like through this method vs. using industry contacts historically at top-tier B-schools?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://wallstreetoasis.com/forums/campus-recruiting#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://wallstreetoasis.com/crss/node/12330</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://wallstreetoasis.com/taxonomy/term/4">Business School Barrage</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 16:12:45 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>GameTheory</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">12330 at http://wallstreetoasis.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Forward Year Recruiting</title>
 <link>http://wallstreetoasis.com/forums/forward-year-recruiting</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Just wondering, has anyone heard of anything changing for recruiting this upcoming summer?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://wallstreetoasis.com/forums/forward-year-recruiting&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://wallstreetoasis.com/forums/forward-year-recruiting#comments</comments>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://wallstreetoasis.com/crss/node/11583</wfw:commentRss>
 <category domain="http://wallstreetoasis.com/taxonomy/term/5">Private Iniquity</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 16:35:06 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>GameTheory</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">11583 at http://wallstreetoasis.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
