Where do you see the equity research industry going?
Moderator Note (Andy): Best of WSO - this post originally went up January 2008 and we thought it deserved to go back on the homepage for those who may have never seen it.
I was just talking with an II-ranked independent research analyst. She was really surprised when I told her that I was interviewing with a BB ER firm; she thought that equity research at BB firms is diminishing in importance because of how brokerage is handled these days. And she spoke about how junior most analysts are these days, and increasingly analysts are putting out sophomoric research and not receiving enough training and inadvertently shooting themselves in the foot. I took the stance that research also provides added value to the investment banking arm; she disagreed and said she felt that most bankers thought analysts did not add value.
Well all this got me worried. No one wants to join a dying industry. She was of the opinion that research is increasingly shifting to boutique firms that institutions will pre-pay for research & services. But even if she's right, and someone does take a job with ER at a BB firm where the business is on the wane, you still end up with all the intangibles that an alignment with a BB firm brings; whereas when you work for an independent you start at a disadvantage in terms of exit opportunities.
So can you guys talk about what you think the future for equity research is and how strong the exit opportunities will be for a research associate that looks to get out of the business after 2-3 years?
Most would say it's going down, primarily because of the brokerage changes and everything Spitzer did to institute the Chinese Wall and separate IBD and ER.
That said, when pitching an IPO, the equity research analyst is still very important. Many times companies going public will base their decision on the strength of the ER analyst. Most bankers will value ER analysts to the extent that they can help bring in new capital markets business.
Depending on your goals, ER could be ok to pursue, but most would rather do IBD these days.
One of the BB analysts I spoke to said, after I asked him how one part of ER can be more profitable than another, that it's linked to the amount of activity in the IBD for that particular industry; and so while a chinese wall may exist, this does seem to imply a recognition of the value added by a strong ER dept.
I'm just worried about exit ops. I don't want to be stuck in a dying industry after 3-5 years and I want to make sure I'm a strong candidate for b-school if I so choose. Do you think ER analysts have good mobility into ibd/pe/hf/vc?
Out of the four (IBD/PE/HF/VC), I think the most realistic exit opp is HFs. IBD and PE are going to look for people with deal execution experience which ER will not provide. I have heard of people from ER getting hired into IBD but it was at a very junior level (after one or two years of work experience) and is pretty rare.
My impression is that sell side reseach continues to decrease in prestige and that will make exit opps more limited in the future.
It depends on the individual. I personally know some ER analysts who really worked hard to understand their industries and went on to become successful hedge fund managers. You also get good skills in ER. It depends where you want to end up. HF, ER is great. PE, possible, but not as likely.
I'm mostly concerned with how easily I'll be able to get into a top business school and how easily I'll be able migrate out of ER if I want to (not necessarily to where). I just don't want to get trapped on a sinking ship. In the end I'd rather be in somewhere transction-driven, but at this stage in the game it's all about skill building.
How easy is it to move laterally in BB, not just within ER but within other areas of the bank?
At this time, internal moves are even more difficult than usual. Banks are trying to reshuffle people as they can before laying off.
Those being laid off are scrambling for jobs. This is across the board, not just ER.
FYI http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=attOQILewT3A&refer=home
Granted, but I was talking about after things normalize.
having worked in ER at two bulge bracket banks, i can certainly tell you that the ER business model continues to change these days, and the cash distribution model at most firms seems to have become more and more tenuous, as commissions continue to shrink and hedge funds find more and more esoteric ways to get information that can potentially give them an edge. thus, if you are considering building a career in equity research, you should seriously consider whether or not you're the type of person that can live with a business model that is ever-evolving, and one where revenue generation can be difficult to track given that it's not a business unit that generates direct revenues.
that being said, working at a BB in equity research, either full-time or as a summer intern, will look great on your resume. you have the prestige factor of working at BB, and you also have the training and client exposure that i'd say is often superior to what you'd find at a boutique bank. analysts at big banks generally have much greater visibility than their small bank counterparts, which means that the demands and expectations from associates are higher. that being said, it is a great way to start one's career in finance. secondly, you also have to remember that even if the sell-side business model continues to change, people will ALWAYS need investment advice in some form or another...so even if the ER business changes, all the things you acquire through a stint in ER such as finance skills, accounting skills, buy-side contacts, and relationships you build with industry consultants and CEO's/CFO's will be things that you can carry on to your next job. i myself speak to 1-2 buy-side clients a day, and am on the phone with someone from company management at least once a week. the relationships i've built have been very valuable from a career perspective, and i also feel that having the poise, acumen, and perceptiveness to interview senior management teams is also a very worthwhile skill, especially from the perspective of a buy-sider (i point this out because most people on the sell-side eventually want to move to the buy-side).
on a more senior level, equity research divisions still play an important role at investment banks for the reasons dosk17 mentioned. the research analysts are responsible for vetting potential investment banking transactions, and company management teams often decide to work with banks who have good research analysts. why? it's because once a company goes public, in order to attract new investors in shares of their stock, it's infinitely more helpful to have good analysts providing research coverage on you. research analysts are also important to banks with significant deal flow - in my case, my bank's IBD sees no shortage of deals in our sector, and it's simply impossible to do all of those deals since there's not enough time or resources. as such, my team is responsible for assessing a company to determine its future potential in the capital markets and to gauge a sense of how interested investors will be in the stock issue - obviously we want to dedicate resources to the companies that we believe will be most intriguing to the public markets, and will prioritize those firms over other companies that we don't think will be as interesting.
most people in research end up moving to asset management/hedge funds after 2-3 years, and every so often someone makes the transition to private equity or goes into industry. in general, your exit opportunities from a BB will be much better than those from an independent firm simply because of the perception that you will have better training, client exposure, networks, and "prestige." the person you spoke with probably spoke highly of their experience at an independent firm, but that's because (1) that's where they work, and (2) they already built their reputation at a bigger firm before moving to a smaller shop. in your case, and in the case of anyone else trying to break into finance, i highly recommend building your careerr at the most recognizable shop possible, all else equal. you need the networking opportunities, training, and street cred that comes with a bulge bracket, so if you have opportunities at a BB vs. an independent shop, i'd advise you to most likely go with the BB unless there was something really unusual that compelled you to go for the smaller firm.
also, just put yourself in the shoes of a potential employer - if someone hires with a candidate from a smaller shop and things don't work out, it'll be easy to blame that person for making a "risky hire." in contrast, if an employer hires someone from GS/MS/ML/LEH equity research and things don't work out, they'll just assume that you were probably an outlier based on the perception (or reality) that it's harder to get a job at a top bank. personally, i feel like i've had pretty good opportunities to speak with the buy-side, both in terms of hedge funds and private equity firms...and i think a lot of this has to do with having some big banks on my resume and hopefully knowing a thing or two about the industry i cover.
anyway, hopefully these observations are helpful. i realize that most people on here are aspiring IBers, a few people here actually work in banking, and even fewer people here work in research...but hopefully this sheds some perspective on the equity research biz. like the rest of wall street, we're going through pretty tough times right now, but if you're looking to build a pretty well-rounded financial skill set, learn an industry in-depth, and really understand what moves a stock, i think there's a lot you can gain from an experience in equity research.
WOW! That post was fantastic, numi. Very illuminating. *bookmarks page*
good info with a personal touch..
Numi I am going through an ER interview... can you please advice what would be good questions to ask the MD in ER which will impress them and.. would be beneficial for me too?
also, What skills of ER are tranferable to IB or PE? I just wanted to know skill are common between them could be tranferable. DOEd ER have some unique skill that IB dont have.. and would help me in long run..
searching -- glad i could help. as far as what you can ask the MD, i think you should focus on big picture stuff -- where he thinks the research department is heading, what the key objectives are for his team over the next 2-3 years, how he's tried to differentiate his coverage efforts as compared with other analysts on the streets, and what type of visibility you can expect to get with the sales force, clients, etc.
as far as what translates well into PE, i'd say the ability to analyze companies from the perspective of a long-term investor is the most relevant, as well as your experience in looking at both the operational and financial elements of businesses. i can also say from personal experience that the industry knowledge is very useful; following a sector every day for a couple of years definitely gives you an advantage in understanding what the key drivers of a business are and whether or not they should matter to investors. i've found that my industry knowledge, research skills, contacts, and experience with interviewing company management teams are qualities that have definitely transferred well to PE.
it should be noted that most research associates leave for Asset Management or hedge funds, sometimes because it's a better fit and other times because they don't have the necessary qualifications or are not as sought after in PE. i am definitely among a small minority of people in equity research that made the move to PE, but with enough perseverance i think it is possible for most people. i interviewed at both large and middle-market LBO's and recently made the transition to a $3-6M middle market buyout shop. please refer to the thread here for more details of how i think exit opportunities in banking and research compare, as well as what skills are most transferable; i wrote about it pretty extensively and i think it answers precisely the question you asked.
http://wallstreetoasis.com/forums/curious-about-er
hope this helps
I'm not sure I agree with Numi. Within ER, the prestige factor is not really as relevant as Independent research starts to become a major player. In fact, most buy-side funds loathe BB research because it's purely maintenance and generally bullshit in the first place.
I also don't agree with the training impact, because independent research provides much more of what clients wants these days (rapid response, narrow and deep) as opposed to maintenance and cumbersome action. That's why you see rapid disinvestment at the Bulge in terms of ER, and management culling talent because it's not worth it to them anymore.
The future of the industry derives from the independent model. Sure the bulge bracket will around and will be relevant, but there will be fewer around in number and drastically less resources available to those involved.
as i mentioned in another post (http://wallstreetoasis.com/forums/curious-about-er), what buy-siders care most about that top research platforms can offer are (1) idea generation and (2) access to management. to me, based on my own experience as well as what i've heard from my buy-side contacts, this is the real benefit that the sell-side offers to the buy-side, as you are definitely correct in that most buy-siders build their own models in the first place. for specialized knowledge, i agree that independent research shops may have an advantage in certain pockets and niches, but they certainly have not become a "major player" yet and i don't know if they will in the foreseeable future, considering that many firms have been moving straight to independent consultancies rather than depending on any sell-side firm at all, regardless of whether it's BB or independent.
Is it better to start as a research analyst in the sell-side or in the buy-side (as in Asset Management) in terms of exit ops and compensation?
research seems to feed very well into HF's
well, the reason the buy side says this is because all they get from the sell-side is maintenance and bureaucratic research. They have demanded less, but ultimately still want narrow and deep research on large cap stocks - all the time. There is no one out there providing that.
Look at CSLA in Asia and Redburn and Exane in London. The independent model is fast thriving, and growing rapidly, which is why you see Hedge funds managers like the one the OP listed above talking down the value of BB research.
At the Bulge, you see a clear culling of talent and resources, wherest you have growth in the independent model even during a bear market.
I disagree with both of you guys in that if we are focusing on young people entering ER, I would go as far to say that it doesn't matter where you work at all, as much as who you work for. As an associate your success is more related to the success of the analyst you work for and the relationship/trust you have with that analyst. Honestly, it is one of the few down sides to being an associate in ER, if the analyst you work for doesn't have good credit on the street, the client flow isn't going to be as good. And then taking it a step further, if you don't have the respect/trust of your analyst, you wont be able to get on the phone with management/clients and prove to these clients/managements (most of the time the buyside guys/companies that end up hiring you after ER) your knowledge and potential, you will be going no where fast regardless of where you work.
People get too infatuated with names of firms. It is more granular than that, especially in ER. I spoke to two clients yesterday, one told me JPmorgan research was a joke, the other said he only uses us and them, it varies so much its not worth getting caught up with. If you can find a good analyst and stay on for 2-3 years, I think you will be shocked at the amount of calls you get for people wanting to steal you away.
Also, just to mention something on a previous post, the jump from ER to PE is VERY difficult because you have absolutely no deal experience, ER to IBD is not nearly as difficult so that could be a way to get to PE if that is the end game for you. Since I have started I have seen both associates and analyst jump into IBD so it is doable if you network efficiently (the key to wall street). HF/AM/working for a company in the sector you cover are the most common exit opps from ER. Staying in ER is not a terrible alternative either, if you are a good senior analyst it is a pretty cushy job.
^^ does realize this thread is 4.5 years old?
Reading through this thread, I think ER has improved over the past 4 years. Or rather the alternatives have worsened - dealflow and bonuses are down in IBD, and S&T is basically a perpetual bloodbath.
bringing back an old thread but any updates to the ER story? Any opinions from those in the field?
Insider Look into Equity Research: Tips & perspectives on industry (Originally Posted: 05/08/2015)
Hey all, I've been on/off the site and have found some users post great topics in terms of providing great insight into the industry. Would like to pay it forward in a small way and offer some perspectives. i've worked in the buy side and obtained the CFA, which def helped breaking in (but a brutal process!)
Breaking in, I'd say the best way is to start off on the sell side to gain experience modeling, fielding questions, gaining industry knowledge. It would make you much better prepared going to the buy side if that's your goal. If coming from outside the industry, you'll need to compete with people with experience, so i'd say 1) if you worked at an Exxon for example and have industry background, that can be a big plus if you can marry that with MBA or CFA to spin how you have an edge in following that industry or 2) try to write investment analysis on your own to prove you are passionate about it. Differentiate yourself from the 100's or 1000's of resumes that recruiters will receieve.
Pros: Work is intersting if you like studying how companies operate, you get to gain many different skills (analysis, communication, handling pressure situations etc.), No day is boring as you're either researching something new or obviously following the markets. Intellectually very stimulating and you'll want to be the type that likes to consistently learn.
Cons: I've actually left the industry (so take this with a grain of salt) but for anyone interested in ER, please consider all facets and think about the long term before diving in. I did like the work but decided to leave as much of the intellectual energy one would expend making a thesis ended up as guess work in my opinion (for any of you ER peeps feel free to comment on this). As you get more senior, your comp will be more tied to your stock calls, and to do that you really would need an edge to outperform the market. Did I think I had that? Probably not. For most I don't think that's the case and that's probably ok if you're comfortable with 1) consistently defending your thesis 2) getting heat on wrong calls, which is bound to happen.
I am in my early thirties, so my first advice for the younger guys/girls in the forum would be- a front office job is not the end all be all. In your early/mid 20's it may be the only thing anyone cares about, but trust me, you start caring about work life balance + doing what you're actually interested in VS. what other people are interested in/value. Think about your bosses boss (or his/her boss)- do you want that job?
Anyway, hope that was helpful for you guys. Good luck!
Great post, thanks for sharing your experience! A couple questions to OP and WSOers on this forum:
1) What do you recommend to younger folks starting a ER job soon? What have you done to quickly learn your sector? Did you socialize with ER peers outside of your immediate sector team? From talking to some people, they seem to not have much interaction at all with other teams even if they sit next to each other. Is this normal in Research? How would you handle networking with sell side analysts and buy side contacts outside of the firm?
2) You mentioned you didn't like getting your calls wrong as a sell side analyst. Isn't this more of an issue on the buy side since you're putting clients' capital to work?
On 2) i didn't mention that specifically for sell side. I'd agree it's more of an issue with on th ebuy side
I'll chime in on 1. It's easy to not have a lot of interaction with other teams, but I would recommend branching out a bit when you have the bandwidth. In order though, you're priorities on a standard day should be 1) taking client calls / questions, 2) building your product (models, notes, etc.), and 3) broadly keeping up with the market outside your immediate coverage which is often easiest to do by talking with other teams.
On the guesswork involved in making a stock call - I agree it's difficult and I'm not sure I have an edge or not either but if you put a gun to my head I would say that I do. I think this mindset is pretty important especially on the sellside as you have to have conviction in your calls. I would also say you can get a lot of credit not just on being right on a stock, but by correctly calling an industry theme or something of that nature.
Thanks iregula. What did you decide to do next? I imagine you were looking for a good work/life balance with decent comp?
Will Equity Research Be Short Lived Due to the Investment Banking Industry's Downfall? (Originally Posted: 09/18/2008)
Will Equity Research Be Short Lived Due to the Investment Banking Industry's Downfall?
What? Your question doesn't make sense.
What is the job outlook for becoming an equity research analyst given that the investment banking industry, or wall street as a whole, is experiencing reformation?
Big fan of the reformation term. Here's what we have known for awhile. Equity research since the introduction of the Chinese Wall has become almost a loss leader for banks. Also, the quality of the research has declined, very few sell-side analysts have a massive amount of experience in the space they cover anymore. Many of the best analysts have left the sell-side and gone on to HFs. I would expect more cutbacks.
Dignissimos est nostrum molestiae possimus fugiat alias. Rerum corporis nulla aspernatur libero nam. Illum sit nobis molestiae.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Voluptas reiciendis voluptates unde et at quae atque. Voluptatum et fugiat et veritatis voluptatem. Est enim numquam minus rerum.
Nobis inventore sint quam facilis tenetur nulla consequatur. Placeat tenetur assumenda ut sunt odio voluptate. At qui fuga est quia.