Only KKR would have the hubris to “re-invent” stock based compensation
Why is this being taken so seriously?
Why is this being taken so seriously?
+247 | I should have been a marketing girly (a rant) | 81 | 7h | |
+113 | PE Firms with Gentrification Strategy | 34 | 1d | |
+71 | WORST/UGLY sides of a career in PE??? | 27 | 10h | |
+54 | Vista vs Thoma Bravo | 17 | 16m | |
+52 | Is HBS / Wharton MBA / Stanford GSB worth it? | 23 | 1d | |
+44 | The Morality of PE | 11 | 1d | |
+31 | Burnt Out 2nd Year Analyst Dreading Move to PE | 2 | 1d | |
+28 | What is Synthetic PIK??? | 29 | 56m | |
+27 | Is PE a career for the uninspired, unambitious, and untalented? | 8 | 3s | |
+25 | I discovered my personal boundaries | 10 | 1d |
Career Resources
Lol, I remember glancing a similar headline and thinking, isn’t that just stock-based comp?
Either the journalists are morons or just owned.
The whole point is that it goes to rank and file employees, which is definitely not the typical SBC usage
Lmao yeh this is pretty absurd. They made crazy headlines with their Gardner Denver deal when they issued options. Isn’t partnership half of what PE is about
Nesciunt eos in et assumenda sint est itaque. Aut et dolor aut recusandae quis. Voluptas aut qui voluptate quibusdam. Dolor animi commodi temporibus. Iusto aperiam vero commodi et.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...